PROCEEDINGS PART II-B

CLICK FOR PROCEEDINGS PART III-A 

Proceedings of the Fifth SA Intl Conf[Feb 20th, 21st, 2010], at Gurgaon, India:

PART II-B:

Technical Discussions:

After my talk on “SA Light on Afflictions Hidden in the Div Charts”, the Professor asked the delegates to seek any clarifications with regard to Charts, if they so desired. Immediately after the talk, Roop Saranji making the foll observation, asked Prof Choudhry what should be the correct course of action? ‘Now that, there is always the possibility of some things being hidden in the Div Charts, the prospect of having to examine so many Div Charts looks daunting, so what should be our approach? The Professor replied, that the Rasi Chart has a great deal to offer, and one must just learn to look carefully for all major aspects within the RC itself, first, and then going over to the DCs, only when this is has become necessity, because of some trouble in that area.’

There were several Charts brought up by Amman Sainiji, or by Rakesh Sharmaji, and Naval Kishoreji, Gaurav Dhamejaji. Some of these questions were raised in the session, after Tea in the afternoon and some were presented after Roop Saranji’s talk on the second day. Though I may not be reproducing their discussions in the exact chronological order in which they occurred, at least, I’ll try to cover all or most of these discussions, to the extent that my memory has been able to record, and retain.

Case Study # 1 of Sri Sainiji:
A case of marital discord.
Husband: [14-May-1963, 13:15hrs, (81E51, 25N27), TZ=IST]
Wife: [30-April-1969, 12:19hrs, (86E23, 23N20), TZ=IST]

By way of introduction, Sainiji disclosed the following details about this case study: That the couple (husband & wife), with their two children, had lived together amicably, for a period of twelve yrs, and thereafter a rift developed, on the grounds of an allegation levelled by the wife, to the effect that, the husband was having an illicit relationship with her friend. That in spite of his best efforts, he could not convince the wife, that he was beyond reproach. That the man, under such pressure from the nagging wife, had no option, but to part company with her and the kids, and had moved to another rented apartment. That this separation did not of course, come in the way of the husband, sending a sum of money every month to the wife, for the maintenance of his separated family.

That there was no legal dispute as yet, and that the husband, vehemently denies the charges of an illicit affair with the friend of the wife, etc.

Sainiji raised one interesting question, ‘Now that, a well-bonded marriage, which had survived for twelve years, suddenly broke up, may we know from you Professor, what was responsible for the marriage surviving all these years?

Professor Choudhry replied that, ‘Though the IIH and IVH of the wife’s Cancer Asdt Chart were strong, yet, Ju, which is the general significator of the husband, being involved in a close affliction of an orb of 3 degrees, with the Malefics Ke and Re, in due course, one would have expected, this close affliction from the Nodes, to ripen, so as to create such a marital discord.’

He also pointed out that, things were unfavourable in the husband’s Chart as well: His Asdt Lord, the Su, was under an exact affliction from the set-back giving Ke, and the PD of the spouse, Sa was badly placed in the VIH of conflicts. Moreover the Nodes had nearly frozen at the same position as the Natal Ke and Ra-and this is known to create difficult stresses.

The Professor’s overall verdict was that this separation is difficult to resolve, and so it is likely to continue along the same lines.

Case Study # 2 of Sri Sainiji:



In this case, both husband and wife were Pisces Asdts. Husband: [11-July-1967, 23:35Hrs, (77E13, 28N40), TZ=IST] MEP=17degs 10mts.
Wife: [17-June-1975, 0:45hrs, (77E13, 28N40), TZ=IST] MEP=7degs03mts.
It was again a case of marital discord.

Sainiji, brought up this example, just to illustrate, how while classical Vedic Astrology’s ‘compatibility test’ had given this pair of Charts, a fairly high score of 25 points; in practical life, the couple had a lot of disharmony in their marital life, and his other significant point was that, the SA, by contrast, does not give a favourable compatibility verdict, and what is more, even pinpoints, which are the areas of difficulty in married life. He said, the husband had contacted him and that the couple no longer live together, though there has been no formal legal divorce.

Professor Choudhry, stated that this couple, are unlikely to go for a legal separation, and from the feedback that they are not even doing the remedial measures, he held that the deadlock will continue in the same fashion, without the situation resolving itself into one way or the other.

Case Study # 3 of Sri Sainiji:

This once again concerned a marital discord between the husband and wife.

Husband: [31-01-1967, 9:30am, (77E13, 28N40), TZ=IST] Pisces Asdt, MEP=2degs 11mts.

Wife: [23-06-1973, 12:00hrs, (77E13, 28N40), TZ=IST] Virgo Asdt, MEP=2degs 59mts.

Though the data was made available by Sainiji, Professor’s verdict, was not sought, for want of adequate time.

Case Study # 4 of Sri Sainiji:

Elder Brother: [9-10-1957, 13:56hrs, (75E54, 31N31), TZ=IST] Capricorn Asdt MEP=1deg07mts.

Younger Brother: [14-7-1959, 17:40hrs, (75E54, 31N31), TZ=IST] Sagittarius Asdt , MEP= 1deg, 48mts.

This was the fourth of the CSs brought up by Sainiji. It was a dispute between an elder brother and his younger brother, concerning inheritance. The question was, which of the two brothers will become the inheritor, the elder one or the younger one? This question was posed to the Professor.

Looking at the two Charts, the elder brother’s Capricorn Asdt Chart first, Professor said: “Here Ma, ruling assets, though placed in the IXH, is very combust and also closely afflicted by the MMP [Most Malefic Planet], Su, and the Inheritance Lord, the Su is itself closely afflicted, by the loss giving Malefic Ju, and as the Su sub-period is also running, till June 2010, the elder brother has less chances of securing the inheritance.”

Going over to the younger brother’s Chart, next, Professor commented, more or less, like this: “Here, the Lord of inheritance is placed in the H of gains, without any affliction, and the Asdt Lord Ju is also placed in the H of gains, and aspecting the Lord of Fortune, which aspects the Asdt in turn, these factors are favourable for him to gain the inheritance.”

The favourable Ve sub-period:[28-10-’09 to 28-8-‘12]
The favourable Su sub-period:[28-8-’12 to 04-07-‘13]

PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 CONFERENCE